27 May 2007

LET'S MOVE TOWARD THE REALITY OF GLOBAL CONSCIOUSNESS!


Key phrases probably more than abused in our Money and Success-Oriented Society, are the terms "Upward Mobility, or The Land of Opportunity!" Oh, how those phrases turn me off!

These phrases, I suppose, are meant to imply 'let's get to the top of the heap as fast as we can, and with all the ruthlessness it takes to get there!" Or something of that ilk!

Let's take an honest look at this kind of non-thinking--where is it really coming from? For openers it's originating at the lowest, most primitive part of our limbic system, somewhere back there in that Darwinian "survival of the fittest" "dog-eat-dog" mentality that is at the root of our worst behavior--birthed from the core of our beloved Money Game.

Without moving away from the Money Game we can never expect to move toward World Unity or hope for realistic Global Consciousness. The heart of the issue centers on Money Games that lead to the disease of class struggle.

Change can only come through a rise in consciousness that creates a natural offspring; A UNITED SPIRIT OF SHARING. Moreover, it can't be locked into a Spiritual Movement bound by proselytizing denominational dogma's, classist charity schemes, or hidden political agenda's.
To move into this kind of NEW WORLD, free of MONETARY PERVERSIONS, our entire thinking as a species now tainted by financial achievement ideas, must be thrown out the window, because they blot out our noblest ambitions and dull the capacity for realistically, sincere, unified endeavors of WHOLENESS.

Why,the whole idea of CLASS, WEALTH and SPIRITUALITY are antipodal, even though our present dreams of happiness have become psychologically entangled in the fancies of Prosperity Thinking, which has permeated the core of even our most fervent spiritual endeavors--and we all know who has been responsible for the worst kinds of these monetary exploitations--the very institutions we place so much hope in for the highest and most noble ideas as a people.
Let's face it--Who ends up footing the bill for world reformation and the feeding of the poor? It is the people who know what it is like to be poor, people who can sympathize with the lower end of the financial spectrum, people who have suffered under the thumb of classism.

The savage drive toward individual survival has become a rat race to achieve financial success, an uncessary burden we have carried for far too long. We must climb our way upwards from the muck and the mire of primitive, uncivil, social regressions based on these kinds of petty financial aims, to a New World free of the insane leadership they engender (with those who obviously have devious, barbaric, criminal ambitions)--and began to act and live like Higher Beings.

We as a Species must now began to pull ourselves up to the next level of growth. Our brains and nervous systems have all the neuronal synapses necessary to foster this rise in consciousness, and we have but to take the next step--the step that frees us from the addiction we have to that monster of greed and selfishness that lurks in the illusions of the ALMIGHTY DOLLAR!!

Let us rise like cream to the top of our social game of life and began to act like Global Humanity and leave this savage, classist, monetary parochialism behind us in the dust of an ancient, and soon to be discarded past.

Many blessings!
Nahu Lanham

24 May 2007

ARE OUR GENES GOD?


Are we, as Richard Dawkins suggests, sacrifices to our genes, or do we have a choice in the matter? The question that arises is how far do we take the sacrificial equation? For instance Dawkins portrays us as: "Survival machines--robot vehicles." The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, Great Britain, 1990.

But isn't that a double entendre? After all, if we are 'robots' doesn't that negate self-awareness?
Dawkins wrote: "We are survival machines--robot vehicles blindly programmed to preserve the selfish molecules known as genes." My question is, what does this say about Dawkins' sense of self-awareness and control? Perhaps he is the robot who feels controlled by a power beyond himself--dare we call it a genetic God? His comments all seem to hint that "the devil made me do it," the deus ex machina, the ghost in the machine that is responsible for his behavior and somehow is keeping him from acting responsibly to address his own issues on will.

This idea sets a dangerous precedent, because if we buy into it, the right to "free will" must be thrown out the window. Let's face it, altruism requires action on our part--to change the world in a constructive manner, takes persoal action. If we are controlled by a selfish gene that demands sacrifice without compensation, then the results of the sacrifice would be in vein. Would you not agree with this contention?

Dawkins does not include, as far as I know, any recognition of the importance of numinous transformations of consciousness and the Maharishi effect, that encounter with the Divine which produces an epiphany and changes our direction in life from a selfish mode, to one that produces extreme acts of selfless-sacrifice to others or to the world as a Whole.

In its place he writes about a male mantis that is eaten by the female during copulation to insure the continuation of the species. Unfortunately, this example doesn't include any participatory insights into the male's consciousness of the role he plays in the act. In fact,the interpretation almost comes off sounding suspiciously anti-female--

More specifically, the ultimate question that unfolds, is what part in our genetic evolution do we play? Isn't there something positive in us that influences the future to change the course of human history--wasn't that trait implicate in Darwin's assumptions that evolution has a goal; that of survival--survival for what and at what price, seems the bigger quest.

What is the ultimate implication here, that we change just for our individual self-fulfillment or is it ultimately that the species AND THE PLANET as a WHOLE, is assured?

Somehow I think that beneath it all, God has managed to survive in this Wholeness we have managed to assign to our own demands.

With human conscientiousness~
Nahu Lanham